It's
nearly impossible to access nonordinary experience with ordinary consciousness
because the ordinary consciousness we learn in this society tends to
be exclusive. That is, our consciousness splits up what we see into
pieces so that we interpret what we see and feel from a linear cause-and-effect
perspective. This sort of mental organization has benefits, but stubborn
reliance on exclusive thinking makes it difficult for us to imagine
any other way of interpreting our world. In the end, we develop a form
of tunnel vision that selects out only a small portion of total reality.
In other words, the truth is out there all around us . . . but we (unconsciously,
at least) insist on the habit of narrow vision. We miss so much!
Part of our problem is rooted in our dependency on the tidy American
life that we have come to love. We are addicted comfort. We don't want
to be bothered by nasty things like death or anything else that pushes
the boundaries of what we, by common consent, have decided we want to
believe. Certainly, this view does contribute to a sense of safety and
security, although, perhaps, our society could profit from the realization
that our stubborn pursuit of security isn't common. In fact, we qualify
as a curious, and perhaps unhealthy, anomaly to much of the world. There
are cultures in Africa, Asia, or in less developed parts of the Western
world, that find our need for a tightly controlled existence the height
of foolishness.
In contrast to the dominant North American/Western European view, there
are a number of cultures that are comforted by the belief that humanity
is connected to the dynamic universe. Humans aren't a discrete phenomenon.
By tapping into a deep understanding of the universe, these cultures
are able to transcend the uninteresting "ordinariness" of
modern culture. This insight accounts for a number of rites and rituals
that these cultures take seriously, but which we, as tourists, consider
a quaint photo-op. Sadly, native cultures have become so accustomed
to tourist mentality that they usually deliver a tourist-grade version
of what they otherwise consider sacred. Since genuine rituals are a
subtle play on consciousness, tourists aren't welcome. Those involved
in a genuine ritual prefer to remain focused on their consecrated space.
Gawkers disrupt the flow.
In truth, real rituals are notoriously boring for vacationing onlookers
because, to be effective, these rituals must be experienced from the
inside out. There is little Hollywood-style flash and fury. Emotions
and feelings have purpose and power that transcends the individual.
They don't merely represent inferior forms of knowing. They are where
the action is! The message is that, in rites and rituals, one can't
be an onlooker; one must be a participant. One's state of being is vital
for the results one is likely to get.
Linking this idea to paranormal investigation that takes place in Western
cultures, we might conclude that, to experience phenomena, we must engage
in rituals that are common for certain indigenous people that do see
ghosts and other spirits. Sure, we can try, but it is a mistake to confuse
ritual with the result that the ritual is supposed to elicit. If a ritual
is alien to our culture, it will likely appear to us as awkward and
artificial. It will just be a show. It is more useful to realize that
our task isn't to emulate other cultures; it is to find a way to work
with paranormal investigation within our culture. Is this an unrealistic
goal? Not if we learn to arrange our American thought so that it supports
paranormal investigation in a way that harmonizes with, and extends,
how we have learned to think in our culture. Yes, we continue to use
a solid scientific approach during an investigation, but we integrate
this scientific approach with subtle elements that deepen our understanding.
Maybe the secret of conducting an investigation lies in learning not
to try too hard. Maybe it lies in not taking our mission too seriously.
Instead of focusing on the absolute necessity of seeing a ghost, maybe
it's more useful to work on putting ourselves into a state of mind that
is most likely to make us receptive to ghostly phenomena. Accessing
the right state of mind is tricky. Often, it means that an investigator
must not only be able to suspend disbelief, but must also suspend belief.
That is, we don't have expectations about what we might experience.
It's not that we don't care (which, in a way, is having an opinion);
it means our mind freely takes in events to which to it is exposed.
In many ways, we are emulating the mind of a child: we take in what
is around us, but don't match up experienced events with learned expectations
that take the form of mental chatter.
I can't stress the matter strongly enough: adult chatter is a powerful
blocking mechanism. This adult blocking mechanism frequently appears
in standard scientific studies in which an investigator sets out to
"prove" a selected slice of reality. In this quest to prove,
the selected slice will soon begin to appear in everything from corned
beef hash to the kitchen sink. Although convenient for exploring specific
details, the capacity to block leads to a narrow black-and-white view
of the world that stubbornly insists that one only reality is absolutely
correct. Such rigidity doesn't apply to children. A child has a natural
advantage because the child hasn't acquired the adult capacity for mental
chatter that covers what, in essence, may be perfectly natural phenomena
that only we inflexible adults consider "nonordinary" experience.
A child's mind is fluid, not exclusive. It is open. It does not emulate
the adult mind by recognizing some information and by blocking other
information.
To review, a child's thinking is remarkably fluid-which may account
for the unusual propensity of children to experience phenomena that
escapes our attention. The reason is that their mind is more open than
the mind of an adult. That is because they haven't collected enough
information to lead to a black-and-white mentality. This mental flexibility
may be why children are more capable of exhibiting sensitivity to paranormal
activity.
Of course, paranormal researchers are adults. We have to work with the
mentality we have. We can, however, still learn by observing the fluidity
of children (that is, when they aren't busy developing the ego identity
that will eventually lead to blocking). We have to be able to admit
that we don't know it all. We must acknowledge that our thinking can
be as fluid as that of a child. When our thoughts reach the desired
level of fluidity, our powers of observation will peak.
This all sounds good, but I suspect you might be thinking that fluidity
is easier said than done. Although this conclusion is true, fluidity
is not the impossible dream. With a little dedicated effort, we can
open our minds. We can explore mental fluidity. But how?
My suggestion is that we try out some meditation practices. I don't
mean that we begin adhering to this or that religion. What I mean is
that we learn to quiet the mind so that our habit of blocking relaxes.
By practicing meditation. we might realize that, in essence, the mind
is fluid. That is its nature. It's fluid for a child because, once again,
a child hasn't learned to block the natural flow with learned information
that sets up patterns of neuronal firing that we use again and again
to support a consistent reality. Such patterns may seem comforting,
but the sad truth is that habits of thinking quickly make us into fuddy-duddies.
Meditation breaks up fuddy-duddy pattern holding by breaking up dependence
on accustomed patterns of thinking so that new ideas can filter through.
One way of illustrating the meditative process is to imagine a piece
of elastic netting that's tightly scrunched up into a knot. There isn't
much we can introduce into the knot because, if it is very elastic,
the knot pulls itself together so tightly that there's no room for anything
else. If, however, we pick up the knot and pull at it for awhile, the
knot's elasticity will eventually lose its snap. The knot relaxes. When
it relaxes, we can see what was blocked by the knot. Maybe it was a
dresser. Maybe it was a mirror. Maybe it was an entity standing on the
other side of the room. The point is that the more we relax the mind,
the more we are likely to increase our perceptions.
No, I can't guarantee that a meditative practice will increase receptivity
to paranormal phenomena, but I can point out that a number of cultures
that honor the practice of meditation demonstrate an unusual sensitivity
to paranormal activity. It isn't because people in these cultures are
unusually psychic (or gullible); it's because they are open to the paranormal.
Actually, according to these cultures, such activity isn't paranormal.
What we call nonordinary experience is, in fact, a normal part of life.
Why? Possibly because the culture has allowed minds to embrace subtle
elements in the environment that we Westerners routinely miss. A sensitive
culture isn't more imaginative; we are more closed. We can profit from
experimenting with different ways of using our minds. Meditation is
a good start.
What sort of practice should we try? It doesn't matter. The best approach
is to look around and see what's out there, and then, on the basis of
collected information, to choose a method with which each of us feels
comfortable. Often we are attracted to a particular practice because
of a particular quality about the practice that resonates with us as
an individual. This resonance is important because, sometimes, we learn
a practice and, in the course of practicing, we find a way to explain
the practice so that it suddenly harmonizes with, and enhances, our
personal understanding. I can use myself as an example: I always had
trouble working through the idea of having "nothing" in my
head. What is nothing? I felt like I had to fight to have nothing in
my mind. I was doing too much work! Then, one day, I realized that it
was far better for me to pursue a feeling of "everythingness."
That is, I relaxed the mind so that I could "step back" and
let the whole universe flow into my mind. I realized that "everythingness"
is nothing in particular. This realization helped. In opening the mind
in this way, I experienced a heightened state of receptivity, the sort
of receptivity that, yes, is ideal for experiencing paranormal phenomena.
In this state of mind, it, as of yet, hasn't occurred to me to feel
fear, or have a feeling of being "creeped out" (both of which
are sensations that lead to blocks) when confronted with unusual experience.
If I see anything out of the ordinary, I'm curious, but neither surprised
nor excited. I'm merely in a receptive state of mind.
In this discussion, I don't refer to meditation as a spiritual practice.
I've been more pragmatic: a meditative mind is a great mental state
from which to observe paranormal phenomena. There's plenty of room to
experience the nonordinary without the blocks of expectation. I encourage
meditative practice, not just for its ability to allow us to cope with
our lives, but also because its value as a tool for rediscovering the
unencumbered child mind that opens us to unaccustomed experience. It's
where we want to be! Once our mind is open, we are ready to progress
to the introduction of scientific method into research. . . .
©2004
Angela Berquist, Ph.D. All Rights Reserved.
Unauthorized duplication is prohibited.
[Click Here To Return To
Articles Index]

About
Us | Ghosts
& Hauntings | Other Anomalies |
Links & Resources | Member
Area | Site Map